Sometimes, things just go "click" in your brain.
The other day, I was watching a great educational video about psychology which, as some point, emphasized on how positive and negative reinforcement don't mean praise and punishment.
That bit of data nested in my brain until, several days later, I heard someone say "Our coach should praise us more, we could do with some positive reinforcement here".
Click. A question was born: Why oh why have we come to associate positive with good and negative with bad? And how does it influence our lives?
Meanings
When it comes to reinforcement, positive and negative mean reinforcing a learning process either via the addition or the subtraction of a signal or stimulus. Meaning that if I want you to stop eating my hard earned Nutella, I could start playing very loud death metal music right in your ears when you start chewing (I add the music, positive reinforcement). Then I cold stop it when you throw the pot away to go assume a fetal position in a corner of the room (I stop the music, negative reinforcement). Here, I'm not praising, I'm just starting and stopping a punishment (except if you're a fan of death metal, and in this case, well, cholesterol for you!).
And actually it makes sense: positive comes from the latin 'ponere', to put something, while the word negative comes from 'negare', to deny.
Now, what about positive thinking? The majority of material I've come accross, up to Wikipedia, associate positive thinking with optimism, which is, seeing the good in the bad.
As for negative thinking, it is almost always linked to angry and frustrated feelings.
But wait...
Is optimism positive?
Does optimism always mean thinking by addition? Is being angry a negative feeling?
Coming back to my desperate attempt at protecting my Nutella, I am in a situation where the factors are Me, You and the Chocolate Paste.
Optimism would mean that I'm happy for you, after all you're the one getting all the fat in that deal. But thinking by addition, I would charge you a small fee for each spoonful, and I would change the equation to Me+You+Chocolate+Money.
Now, if I get angry, the situation doesn't really change, and it's actually positive reinforcement that I'm applying: I deliver a foam-at-the-mouth tantrum you will probably not like in hope you stop scavenging my bounty.
Now, real negative thinking would mean: I just lock the Nutella away, removing it from the equation entirely.
So here, anger is actually a positive action almost at the same level as getting money, and I also get more immediate result by acting negatively.
Wait what the?
Yes, it's confusing. And it come from the fact that, lazy mammals that we are, we're quick to use positive and negative as placeholders for things that make us feel good and things that don't, because screw it.
Being pattern-recognizing, systematic brained creatures, we have a tendency to focus on results rather than processes (as proven by, you know, deforestation, climate change, CO2 pollution and diet programs). So, when we qualify a behavior as positive or negative, we actually mean: a behavior that will result in a productive and beneficial, or impeding an problematic outcome.
If it's understandable… it's also somehow irritating since it can seriously mess up everyday communication. You can't really expect a result when you don't understand the underlying process; I know I can't just wish Nutella in my mouth if I don't know how to open the pot. But saying "I have to be positive" without knowing what it implies, is the same as if I said 'Feed me Nutella' without giving a damn about how to open the pot, whether it's someone else's pot, or weather it takes a full warehouse of underpaid Oompa-loompas to get it to my mouth. I know right, but I'm HUNGRY!
On a more personal level, how we expose thoughts greatly influence how they are perceived: if I told you the Batman hit my nose, you probably won't picture him hitting has hard as if I'd said the Batman crushed my nose, even if the the outcome is similar, because Batman.
Positive douchebaggery
As an more relatable example, let's say I have a good friend who one day turns out to be unusually crabby. The equation will be Me + her + the crabbiness. What's important here is to see the crabbiness as her feelings: she's expressing a thought process.
So when I ask my grumpy friend "Why are you being so negative?" instead of asking her "Why are you angry and sad?", there's a huge chance that she'll translate it to "Why are you making me/both of us feel bad". That's because instead of focusing on her feelings, I'd focus on her feeling's impact.
If I continue in that direction and, instead of asking her "What are you angry and sad about and how can we change that", I tell her to "Be positive about it", she might very well receive it as "Suck it up" because, once again, but focusing on the outcome, I took her feelings out of the equation.
If I take her feelings out of the equations, then who's acting in a negative fashion? Yes, me. By trying to apply what I loosely saw as 'positive thinking', I actually acted negatively and, coincidentally as a perfect douche bag.
Is there an alternative to using those therms?
Absolutely yes: Identifying the process behind situations.
Sentences like "There must be a positive solution to my bad mood" becomes "Where does my sad mood come from and what can I do about it?"
"Her attitude is negative" becomes "Why is she angry and what can be done about it?" and "How can I prevent Batman form plundering my Nutella" becomes "Why is Batman craving for my sweet stash and can I tell Alfred to feed him more carbs?"
And do you know why it makes sense? Because identifying the source of a problematic outcome, finding out the reason for an unwanted situation, will reveal the problem itself: it will show you the equation et let you decide what to add or remove.
Of course, not sharing Facebook one-liners about positive thinking works great too...
What do you think? Are you sharing these views? Be positive about it and add some comment, I'd love to know your views.
Erratum: I'm mentioning the addition of an unwanted signal as positive reinforcement, it's actually positive punishment. Think positive!
Note: In the podcast, my voice is pitched down, not for privacy reasons, but to be more agreeable to your ears. I'll get better hardware soon.